vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Global Business Travel Group, Inc. (GBTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $792.0M, roughly 1.7× Global Business Travel Group, Inc.). Global Business Travel Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -3.5%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Global Business Travel Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
A travel management company (TMC) is a travel agency which manages organizations' corporate or business travel programs. Such companies will often provide an end-user online booking tool, mobile application, program management, and consulting teams, executive travel services, meetings and events support, reporting functionality, duty of care, and more. Non-Profit travel management companies also provide services to manage complex visa requirements, pre-trip medical needs, remote area travel, ...
CC vs GBTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $792.0M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 34.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 692.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $792.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $674.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $591.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $597.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $625.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $610.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $-128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $434.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.88× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $434.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $601.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $552.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $536.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $524.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $515.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $475.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 1.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $104.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
GBTG
| Travel | $620.0M | 78% |
| Other | $172.0M | 22% |
