vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.3× Chemours Co). Huntington Ingalls Industries runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs -3.5%, a 12.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Huntington Ingalls Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $-461.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Chemours Co's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -25.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) is the largest military shipbuilding company in the United States as well as a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. HII was formed on 31 March 2011, as a divestiture from Northrop Grumman.
CC vs HII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $149.0M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $3.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $149.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $149.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $173.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.79 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $3.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $3.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $3.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $4.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $216.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $12.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $11.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $-390.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $-461.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | -27.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $795.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-390.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $-395.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $391.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $-9.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-461.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $516.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-462.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $277.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $-99.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | -3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.62× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | -0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
HII
Segment breakdown not available.