vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC (JHG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC runs the higher net margin — 35.3% vs -3.5%, a 38.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.3% vs -2.1%). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($320.4M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC's revenue compounded faster (43.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
CC vs JHG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $403.2M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 35.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 61.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $700.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $633.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $621.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $708.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $624.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $588.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $551.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $142.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $149.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $129.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 26.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 23.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $8.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $322.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $320.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 28.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $710.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $322.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $258.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $228.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $-5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $320.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $256.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $900.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $221.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $-6.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | -0.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
JHG
| Investment Advice | $585.2M | 51% |
| Investment Performance | $425.8M | 37% |
| Other | $76.4M | 7% |
