vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC). LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -3.5%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Chemours Co's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -2.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
CC vs LSTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $39.4M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 32.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $411.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $26.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $799.0M |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $411.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $452.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $434.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $426.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $473.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $566.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $531.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $504.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $0 |
| Q1 26 | — | $799.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $795.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $921.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $930.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $972.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $72.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $55.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $48.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $70.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $75.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $40.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 4.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
LSTR
Segment breakdown not available.
