vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $752.6M, roughly 1.8× OGE ENERGY CORP.). OGE ENERGY CORP. runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs -3.5%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OGE ENERGY CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.7% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, OGE ENERGY CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
CC vs OGE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $752.6M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $50.2M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -19.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $752.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $701.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $719.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $741.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $744.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $945.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $644.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $69.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $102.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 59.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 62.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 63.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 69.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 27.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $1.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $200.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $300.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $500.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $600.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $100.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $14.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $14.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $384.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $397.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $338.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $129.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $347.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $253.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $168.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-233.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $-167.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $103.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $-70.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | -10.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 43.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 50.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 2.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
OGE
| Residential | $260.4M | 35% |
| Commercial | $212.0M | 28% |
| Public authorities and street light | $61.9M | 8% |
| Industrial | $60.7M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $58.4M | 8% |
| Integrated market | $47.3M | 6% |
| Transmission | $40.7M | 5% |
