vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (REZI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.4× Chemours Co). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs -3.5%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -2.1%). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($262.0M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Resideo Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational company that was formed in 2018 out of a spin-off from Honeywell. It provides room air temperature, quality, and humidity control and security systems primarily in residential dwellings in the U.S. and internationally. The company operates in two segments: products and distribution. It manufactures and distributes smart-home and software products, including temperature and lighting control, security, and water and air monitoring. The com...
CC vs REZI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $136.0M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 491.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $-825.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 26.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $-5.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $661.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $661.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $753.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $577.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $692.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $413.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $603.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $299.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $262.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $-1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $299.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $200.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $262.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | -85.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | -10.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 3.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
REZI
| ADI Global Distribution Segment | $1.2B | 62% |
| Safety And Security | $257.0M | 14% |
| Air | $211.0M | 11% |
| Energy Service | $153.0M | 8% |
| Public Utilities Inventory Water | $91.0M | 5% |
