vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $883.8M, roughly 1.5× RH). RH runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -3.5%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RH posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $83.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RH's revenue compounded faster (9.4% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
CC vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $738.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 43.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $123.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $-289.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $-297.4M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $-114.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $-251.5M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | -10.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
