vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Schneider National, Inc.). Schneider National, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.6% vs -3.5%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Schneider National, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.2% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $48.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Chemours Co's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -2.8%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Schneider National, Inc. is an American transportation company that provides truckload, intermodal, and logistics services. Schneider's services include regional, long-haul, expedited, dedicated, bulk, intermodal, brokerage, cross-dock logistics, pool point distribution, supply chain management, and port logistics.
CC vs SNDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $20.4M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $35.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $227.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $227.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $235.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $205.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $154.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $165.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $231.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $157.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $390.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $509.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $512.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $565.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $420.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $124.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $125.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $92.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $48.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 3.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $356.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $186.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $91.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $199.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $206.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $182.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $106.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $85.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 5.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
SNDR
Segment breakdown not available.