vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. (THG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.3× Chemours Co). HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs -3.5%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.1% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. is an insurance company based in Worcester, Massachusetts. It was the original name of a property-liability insurance firm established in 1852, and it remained a publicly traded company under that name until the early 1990s, when it changed its name to Allmerica Property & Casualty Companies.
CC vs THG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $186.8M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 45.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $186.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $198.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $178.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $157.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $128.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $40.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $5.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $4.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $4.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $3.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $4.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $2.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $1.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $243.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $843.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $16.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $243.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $915.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $244.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $315.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $435.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $427.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $337.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $843.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $843.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $843.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $347.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $722.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $722.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $16.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $15.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $15.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $14.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $378.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $554.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $213.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $394.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $139.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $377.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $551.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $204.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $392.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 3.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
THG
| Premiums earned | $1.6B | 92% |
| Other | $124.6M | 7% |
| Fees and other income | $6.2M | 0% |
