vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.9× Chemours Co). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs -3.5%, a 26.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -2.1%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CC vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
