vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Trade Desk (The) (TTD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $846.8M, roughly 1.6× Trade Desk (The)). Trade Desk (The) runs the higher net margin — 22.1% vs -3.5%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trade Desk (The) posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs -2.1%). Trade Desk (The) produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.3M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Trade Desk (The)'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
The Trade Desk, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in real-time programmatic marketing automation technologies, products, and services, designed to personalize digital content delivery to users.
CC vs TTD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $846.8M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $186.9M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.3% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 22.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 2.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $846.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $739.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $694.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $616.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $741.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $628.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $584.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $491.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $186.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $115.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $50.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $182.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $94.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $31.7M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 78.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 80.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 78.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $6.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $311.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $285.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 33.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $795.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $311.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $224.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $291.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $273.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $185.5M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $285.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $158.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $232.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $179.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $224.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $59.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $178.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 5.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
TTD
| Other | $427.2M | 50% |
| Non Us | $419.6M | 50% |
