vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC (CCEL) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $7.8M, roughly 1.9× CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -48.7%, a 112.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -2.3%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. is a cord blood bank. It was founded by Dan Richard in 1989. Cryo-Cell International is the first private cord blood bank to separate and store stem cells. Cryo-Cell is headquartered outside of Tampa, in Oldsmar, Florida. In January 1997, the Company's stock began trading on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under symbol CCEL.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
CCEL vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.8M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -48.7% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.3% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -105.1% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.4K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.8K | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.9K | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $655.8K | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $556.2K | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.6% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.4% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.8% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.7% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -50.6% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -48.7% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.2% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4M | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-18.6M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $61.7M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.6K | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.8M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.6M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.7M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.2M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.3M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.2M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.4M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.6M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.7M | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.5% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.2M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $707.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.1K | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-356.9K | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.6K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.0K | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-814.6K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.4% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.37× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.32× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.70× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.64× | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
