vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC (CCEL) and Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.0M vs $7.8M, roughly 1.5× CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC). Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — -24.0% vs -48.7%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.3% vs -39.0%).
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. is a cord blood bank. It was founded by Dan Richard in 1989. Cryo-Cell International is the first private cord blood bank to separate and store stem cells. Cryo-Cell is headquartered outside of Tampa, in Oldsmar, Florida. In January 1997, the Company's stock began trading on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under symbol CCEL.
Metalpha Technology Holding LtdMATHEarnings & Financial Report
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.
CCEL vs MATH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.8M | $12.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 28.3% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | -24.2% |
| Net Margin | -48.7% | -24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.3% | -39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -105.1% | -147.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.4K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.9K | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $655.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $556.2K | — |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.1% | 85.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -50.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 39.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -48.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | -24.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3M | $10.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4M | $101.2K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-18.6M | $35.1M |
| Total Assets | $61.7M | $413.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $101.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $188.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $275.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.8M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.7M | $36.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.2M | $413.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $246.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $237.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3M | $3.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $707.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.1K | $16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-356.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-814.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.37× | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.32× | -2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
