vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaher Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.8× CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 6.3%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danish Crown is an internationally oriented Danish food company with butchery operations, processing and sales of primarily pork and beef. Through a number of subsidiaries, the group is widely represented within the food industry with various food products. The CEO is Niels Duedahl and the headquarters are located in Randers.
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
CCK vs DHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $206.0M | $1.0B |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 22.6% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.3% | 7.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $1.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $5.7B |
| Q1 26 | $206.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.0M | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.0M | $954.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-175.0M | $818.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.0M | $907.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.7% |
| Q1 26 | 11.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | 6.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.32 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.65 | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.01 | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.47 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $584.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $53.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $14.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $584.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $764.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $936.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $918.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $52.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $51.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $52.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $50.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $49.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $51.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $49.9B |
| Q1 26 | $14.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.3B | $83.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6B | $79.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $81.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8B | $79.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8B | $77.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $80.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $78.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.07× | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.18× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.93× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.92× | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $487.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $580.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $445.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $488.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.25× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.71× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | 1.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCK
| Americas Beverage | $1.5B | 47% |
| European Beverage | $588.0M | 18% |
| Transit Packaging | $496.0M | 15% |
| Other | $342.0M | 10% |
| Asia Pacific | $303.0M | 9% |
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
