vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) and Ecolab (ECL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ecolab is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.2× CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.). Ecolab runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 6.3%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs 1.0%).
Danish Crown is an internationally oriented Danish food company with butchery operations, processing and sales of primarily pork and beef. Through a number of subsidiaries, the group is widely represented within the food industry with various food products. The CEO is Niels Duedahl and the headquarters are located in Randers.
Ecolab Inc., headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, provides products related to water treatment, sanitation, and hygiene, primarily to commercial and industrial customers.
CCK vs ECL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3B | $4.1B |
| Net Profit | $206.0M | $432.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.3% | 1.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $1.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $4.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $432.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $563.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.0M | $585.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $524.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.0M | $402.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.0M | $472.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-175.0M | $736.5M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 26 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 26.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 26 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | 18.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | $1.52 | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.32 | $1.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | $2.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.65 | $1.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.01 | $1.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.47 | $2.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $584.0M | $519.8K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $53.0M | $8.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $10.0M |
| Total Assets | $14.3B | $25.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $519.8K | ||
| Q1 26 | $584.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $764.0M | $646.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $936.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $918.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $7.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $8.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 26 | $14.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.3B | $24.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6B | $23.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8B | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8B | $22.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $22.1B |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.07× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.18× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.93× | 0.82× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-129.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $487.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $580.0M | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.0M | $701.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $369.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.0M | $766.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.0M | $786.7M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $-129.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $488.0M | $529.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $485.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.0M | $131.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.0M | $550.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 13.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 5.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.25× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.71× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCK
| Americas Beverage | $1.5B | 47% |
| European Beverage | $588.0M | 18% |
| Transit Packaging | $496.0M | 15% |
| Other | $342.0M | 10% |
| Asia Pacific | $303.0M | 9% |
ECL
| Product and equipment sales | $3.2B | 78% |
| Service and lease sales | $891.5M | 22% |
