vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($461.5M vs $313.0M, roughly 1.5× FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC). FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs 1.7%, a 33.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs 8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.8% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. is a multinational corporation focused on outdoor advertising. The company is based in San Antonio, Texas.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
CCO vs FIBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $461.5M | $313.0M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $108.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 44.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.2% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 144.8% | 108.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.6M | $250.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.8M | $248.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $426.7M | $261.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.2M | $251.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.5M | $244.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.8M | $242.2M |
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $71.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.5M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.9M | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.5M | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-89.7M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.8% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.4% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $146.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.4B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $26.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $193.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $146.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $252.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $137.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $383.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $370.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $26.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $27.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $28.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $29.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $30.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $30.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $56.3M | $305.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.04× | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $32.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $56.3M | $305.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | $355.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $82.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.8M | $87.6M |
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.04× | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.32× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.