vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Duolingo, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.5M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.2× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). Duolingo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs -35.0%, a 46.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Duolingo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.0% vs -23.6%). Duolingo, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($103.0M vs $16.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Duolingo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.7% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Duolingo, Inc. is a leading global edtech firm operating a gamified language learning platform. It offers free and premium self-paced courses for over 40 languages, plus language certification, math learning tools, and literacy programs, serving individual learners, schools and corporate clients worldwide.
CCRN vs DUOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $295.5M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $35.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 27.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $271.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $252.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $230.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $209.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $192.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $178.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $292.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 72.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | 72.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 72.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 71.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 72.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 107.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $5.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $976.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $884.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $854.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $888.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $977.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $893.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $824.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $822.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $766.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $105.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $103.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | 34.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $368.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $84.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $83.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $62.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $89.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $104.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $81.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
DUOL
| Bookings | $283.5M | 96% |
| Other | $12.0M | 4% |
