vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.8× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -35.0%, a 92.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -23.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
CCRN vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
