vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($236.8M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.0× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -35.0%, a 38.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs -23.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-13.8% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
CCRN vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 121.6% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | -25.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $317.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $21.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 121.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-25.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | -7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |
