vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and H2O AMERICA (HTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($236.8M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.2× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -35.0%, a 43.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, H2O AMERICA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.5% vs -23.6%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
CCRN vs HTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $199.4M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $16.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | -29.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $197.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $164.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $173.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $150.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $20.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $63.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $77.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | 4.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
