vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($326.2M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.4× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC runs the higher net margin — -35.0% vs -259.7%, a 224.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, New Fortress Energy Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.0% vs -23.6%). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.1M vs $-134.8M). Over the past eight quarters, CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC's revenue compounded faster (-21.0% CAGR vs -26.8%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
New Fortress Energy Inc. is a global energy infrastructure firm developing, owning and operating LNG import/export terminals, natural gas supply networks and low-carbon projects. It serves utility, industrial and public sector clients across the Americas and Caribbean, delivering affordable, lower-emission energy resources.
CCRN vs NFE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $326.2M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $-847.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | -193.0% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | -259.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | -7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | -277.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $-3.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $326.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $291.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $609.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $-847.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-263.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $-546.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $-175.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-224.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 62.4% |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | -193.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | -170.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 30.4% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | -259.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -109.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | -239.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | -45.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | -64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $-3.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-1.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $226.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $182.6M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 44.78× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $226.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $551.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $447.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $143.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $182.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $10.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $-76.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $-134.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -41.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 18.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $-1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $-76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $-171.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-329.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $445.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $113.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-134.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $-231.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-726.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-262.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $-210.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-367.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-493.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-457.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -41.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -96.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -318.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | -68.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | -60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | -169.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -75.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 174.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 187.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 208.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 85.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | -2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
NFE
Segment breakdown not available.
