vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($236.8M vs $187.0M, roughly 1.3× National Storage Affiliates Trust). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -35.0%, a 47.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Storage Affiliates Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -23.6%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $16.1M). Over the past eight quarters, National Storage Affiliates Trust's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
CCRN vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $5.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
NSA
Segment breakdown not available.
