vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (CD) and ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($466.6K vs $312.0K, roughly 1.5× ENvue Medical, Inc.). Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -640.5% vs -3919.6%, a 3279.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
ENvue Medical, Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in advanced enteral feeding systems and related clinical support solutions. It serves healthcare providers, hospitals and long-term care facilities across North America, focusing on improving safety and efficiency of care for patients requiring enteral nutrition support.
CD vs FEED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $466.6K | $312.0K |
| Net Profit | $-3.0M | $-12.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | -118.6% |
| Operating Margin | -665.1% | -4748.1% |
| Net Margin | -640.5% | -3919.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -29.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -754.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-28.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $312.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $722.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.6K | $494.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $444.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $376.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $817.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $921.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $510.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-998.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-688.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-588.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -118.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4748.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -311.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -665.1% | -804.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -180.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -308.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -258.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -82.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -61.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3919.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -640.5% | -803.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -243.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -322.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -265.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -84.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -63.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-1.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-108.94 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-27.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.2M | $4.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.4M | $33.5M |
| Total Assets | $36.6M | $41.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $752.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $627.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -865.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-9.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-548.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-836.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-553.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-579.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-555.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-580.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -865.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -276.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -685.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -131.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -67.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -63.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
