vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (CD) and Classover Holdings, Inc. (KIDZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Classover Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($537.1K vs $466.6K, roughly 1.2× Chaince Digital Holdings Inc.). Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -640.5% vs -1005.8%, a 365.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Classover Holdings, Inc. is an education technology company that provides live interactive online learning courses targeted primarily at children aged 3 to 12. Its core service portfolio includes STEM, language learning, arts, and social skill development programs, with main markets covering the United States and global Chinese-speaking family segments.
CD vs KIDZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $466.6K | $537.1K |
| Net Profit | $-3.0M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | -665.1% | -184.7% |
| Net Margin | -640.5% | -1005.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $537.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.6K | $725.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $816.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-297.2K |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -184.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -47.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -665.1% | -234.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1005.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 195.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -640.5% | -532.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.4M | $3.8M |
| Total Assets | $36.6M | $15.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-652.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-652.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $-336.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-288.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
