vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (CD) and Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($466.6K vs $365.0K, roughly 1.3× Longeveron Inc.). Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -640.5% vs -1491.5%, a 851.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Longeveron Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in regenerative medicine therapies for aging-related and life-threatening conditions. Its lead candidate targets geriatric frailty, Alzheimer's disease, and cardiovascular disorders, with core operations focused on the U.S. biopharmaceutical market.

CD vs LGVN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CD
CD
1.3× larger
CD
$466.6K
$365.0K
LGVN
Higher net margin
CD
CD
851.0% more per $
CD
-640.5%
-1491.5%
LGVN

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Revenue
$466.6K
$365.0K
Net Profit
$-3.0M
$-5.4M
Gross Margin
70.4%
Operating Margin
-665.1%
-1479.2%
Net Margin
-640.5%
-1491.5%
Revenue YoY
-39.5%
Net Profit YoY
-33.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.05
$-0.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$365.0K
Q3 25
$137.0K
Q2 25
$466.6K
$316.0K
Q1 25
$381.0K
Q4 24
$603.0K
Q3 24
$773.0K
Q2 24
$468.0K
Q1 24
$548.0K
Net Profit
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$-5.4M
Q3 25
$-7.2M
Q2 25
$-3.0M
$-5.0M
Q1 25
$-5.0M
Q4 24
$-4.1M
Q3 24
$-4.4M
Q2 24
$-3.4M
Q1 24
$-4.1M
Gross Margin
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
70.4%
Q3 25
91.2%
Q2 25
46.2%
Q1 25
72.2%
Q4 24
87.7%
Q3 24
88.2%
Q2 24
73.5%
Q1 24
60.0%
Operating Margin
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
-1479.2%
Q3 25
-5335.8%
Q2 25
-665.1%
-1707.9%
Q1 25
-1359.8%
Q4 24
-710.3%
Q3 24
-601.4%
Q2 24
-747.9%
Q1 24
-746.4%
Net Margin
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
-1491.5%
Q3 25
-5270.8%
Q2 25
-640.5%
-1591.1%
Q1 25
-1315.2%
Q4 24
-677.1%
Q3 24
-571.7%
Q2 24
-729.3%
Q1 24
-740.5%
EPS (diluted)
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$-0.23
Q3 25
$-0.39
Q2 25
$-0.05
$-0.33
Q1 25
$-0.34
Q4 24
$1.16
Q3 24
$-0.34
Q2 24
$-1.83
Q1 24
$-1.61

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$27.2M
$4.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$29.4M
$5.7M
Total Assets
$36.6M
$10.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$4.7M
Q3 25
$9.2M
Q2 25
$27.2M
$10.3M
Q1 25
$14.3M
Q4 24
$19.2M
Q3 24
$22.8M
Q2 24
$12.4M
Q1 24
$2.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$5.7M
Q3 25
$10.0M
Q2 25
$29.4M
$12.7M
Q1 25
$17.2M
Q4 24
$21.9M
Q3 24
$25.6M
Q2 24
$14.9M
Q1 24
$3.0M
Total Assets
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$10.3M
Q3 25
$15.6M
Q2 25
$36.6M
$16.7M
Q1 25
$20.8M
Q4 24
$25.6M
Q3 24
$29.9M
Q2 24
$19.4M
Q1 24
$9.7M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.3M
$-5.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
$-5.3M
Q3 25
$-5.1M
Q2 25
$-1.3M
$-3.6M
Q1 25
$-4.7M
Q4 24
$-3.4M
Q3 24
$-2.8M
Q2 24
$-4.6M
Q1 24
$-3.1M
Free Cash Flow
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-5.1M
Q2 25
$-3.8M
Q1 25
$-4.7M
Q4 24
$-3.4M
Q3 24
$-3.3M
Q2 24
$-4.8M
Q1 24
$-3.1M
FCF Margin
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
Q3 25
-3731.4%
Q2 25
-1189.2%
Q1 25
-1239.9%
Q4 24
-561.5%
Q3 24
-423.4%
Q2 24
-1017.5%
Q1 24
-566.1%
Capex Intensity
CD
CD
LGVN
LGVN
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
41.6%
Q2 25
50.9%
Q1 25
7.1%
Q4 24
2.2%
Q3 24
55.6%
Q2 24
41.9%
Q1 24
2.9%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons