vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (CD) and LQR House Inc. (YHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($466.6K vs $299.7K, roughly 1.6× LQR House Inc.). Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -640.5% vs -1368.7%, a 728.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
CD vs YHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $466.6K | $299.7K |
| Net Profit | $-3.0M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -665.1% | -1000.3% |
| Net Margin | -640.5% | -1368.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -64.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 72.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $2.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $299.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $337.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.6K | $498.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $429.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $838.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $624.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $557.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $481.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1000.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1134.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -665.1% | -442.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1221.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -561.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -407.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -513.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1368.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4989.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -640.5% | -441.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -556.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1760.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -538.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -396.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -504.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-88.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.4M | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $36.6M | $31.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-14.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -287.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
