vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and McGraw Hill, Inc. (MH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Coeur Mining, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $434.2M, roughly 5.2× McGraw Hill, Inc.). Coeur Mining, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs -4.7%, a 15.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Coeur Mining, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (529.0% vs -35.1%). McGraw Hill, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.4M vs $266.8M).
Coeur Mining, Inc. is a precious metals mining company listed on the New York Stock exchange. It operates five mines located in North America. Coeur employs 2,200 people and in 2012 it was the world's 9th largest silver producer. In 2013 the company changed its name to Coeur Mining, Inc. from Coeur d'Alene Mines and moved its head office to Chicago, Illinois from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...
CDE vs MH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $434.2M |
| Net Profit | $246.8M | $-20.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | -4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 529.0% | -35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 638.9% | -119.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $674.8M | $434.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $554.6M | $669.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.6M | $535.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $305.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $313.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $246.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.0M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.8M | $105.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.7M | $502.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.9% | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.37 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $0.57 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $843.2M | $514.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $775.3M |
| Total Assets | $15.3B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.36× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $843.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $553.6M | $514.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.3M | $463.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.6M | $247.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $775.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $794.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $283.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $15.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $309.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $266.8M | $285.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.8% | 65.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $914.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $374.6M | $309.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.7M | $265.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.0M | $-96.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $266.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.3M | $285.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.7M | $243.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.1M | $-112.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.4% | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | 36.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.4% | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.89× | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.93× | -192.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.69× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CDE
| EBITDA | $1.3B | 58% |
| Other | $915.9M | 40% |
| Asset retirement obligation accretion | $19.8M | 1% |
| Wage and hour litigation settlement | $6.5M | 0% |
| Inventory adjustments and write-downs | $5.4M | 0% |
| Mexico arbitration matter | $2.6M | 0% |
| Kensington royalty settlement | $29.0K | 0% |
MH
| Higher Education | $225.4M | 52% |
| Digital | $103.5M | 24% |
| Other | $44.4M | 10% |
| Global Professional | $36.2M | 8% |
| $24.7M | 6% |
