vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
M/I HOMES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $674.8M, roughly 1.7× Coeur Mining, Inc.). Coeur Mining, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 5.6%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Coeur Mining, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (120.9% vs -4.8%). Coeur Mining, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($313.3M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Coeur Mining, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (78.0% CAGR vs 4.7%).
Coeur Mining, Inc. is a precious metals mining company listed on the New York Stock exchange. It operates five mines located in North America. Coeur employs 2,200 people and in 2012 it was the world's 9th largest silver producer. In 2013 the company changed its name to Coeur Mining, Inc. from Coeur d'Alene Mines and moved its head office to Chicago, Illinois from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
CDE vs MHO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $674.8M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $215.0M | $64.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 48.6% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.9% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 120.9% | -4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 467.9% | -52.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | $2.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $674.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $554.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.1M | $976.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $305.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $313.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $213.1M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $215.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.8M | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.7M | $121.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.9M | $133.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $145.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $146.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.1M | $138.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.1% |
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 31.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.7% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.37 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $3.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $4.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | $4.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $5.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $5.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $4.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $553.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $553.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $4.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $374.6M | $-8.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $313.3M | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 46.4% | -1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.1% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.74× | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $665.7M | $127.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $374.6M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.7M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.0M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.6M | $64.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.8M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.1M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.9M | $115.8M |
| Q4 25 | $313.3M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.7M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.1M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $102.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.1M | $-68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-58.0M | $115.5M |
| Q4 25 | 46.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.2% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | -0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.89× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.93× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.03× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.69× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.28× | -0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.69× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CDE
Segment breakdown not available.
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
