vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES (CDP) and Gentherm Inc (THRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gentherm Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.8M vs $197.4M, roughly 1.9× COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES). COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES runs the higher net margin — 20.0% vs 0.8%, a 19.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gentherm Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs 7.6%). COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($288.9M vs $6.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Gentherm Inc's revenue compounded faster (3.7% CAGR vs 1.1%).
COPT Defense Properties is a real estate investment trust that invests in office buildings, mostly in the suburbs of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. It primarily leases to the U.S. government or companies in the arms industry. As of December 31, 2024, the company owned 164 office buildings comprising 16.5 million square feet and 31 single-tenant data centers comprising 5.9 million square feet.
Gentherm Incorporated, formerly Amerigon, is an American thermal management technologies company. Gentherm created the first thermoelectrically heated and cooled seat system for the automotive industry. Called the "Climate Control Seat" system, it was first adopted by the Ford Motor Company and introduced as an option on the model year 2000 Lincoln Navigator in 1999. Today it is available on more than 50 vehicles sold by Ford, General Motors, Toyota (Lexus), Kia, Hyundai, Nissan (Infiniti), R...
CDP vs THRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.4M | $382.8M |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $3.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 20.0% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.0% | -80.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.4M | $382.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.8M | $386.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.9M | $375.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.9M | $353.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $183.4M | $352.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.2M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.3M | $375.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $193.3M | $356.0M |
| Q4 25 | $39.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.2M | $477.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.2M | $-128.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 20.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.4% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.29 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $275.0M | $160.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | $189.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $720.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.83× | 0.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | $160.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $154.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $163.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.3M | $134.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.5M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $123.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.1M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $209.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $220.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $222.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $222.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $222.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $720.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $717.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $699.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $646.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $616.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $660.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $640.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $647.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | 1.83× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.63× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.62× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.60× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.63× | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $309.9M | $29.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $288.9M | $6.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 146.4% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.7% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.87× | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $501.5M | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $309.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.6M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.1M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $331.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.1M | $46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.8M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.0M | $-10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $288.9M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.9M | $46.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.1M | $-28.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.6M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.4M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.9M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | 146.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.0% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.87× | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.19× | 94.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.08× | 2.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.58× | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.11× | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CDP
Segment breakdown not available.
THRM
| Climate Control Seats | $200.9M | 52% |
| Lumbar And Massage Comfort Solutions | $58.5M | 15% |
| Climate Control Interiors | $50.3M | 13% |
| Other Automotive | $27.6M | 7% |
| Valve Systems | $24.1M | 6% |
| Medical Segments | $13.9M | 4% |
| Climate And Comfort Electronics | $7.4M | 2% |
