vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.3× Celanese Corp). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -0.8%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -7.0%). Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($234.3M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. is an American global commercial real estate and property management services firm. The company's corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. It is named after co-founders J. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield.
CE vs CWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-22.4M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 10.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -119.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $-28.8M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $784.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $7.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $784.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $634.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $618.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $623.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $793.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $775.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $567.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $553.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 1.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $257.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $234.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 8.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $293.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $257.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $235.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-162.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $-125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $234.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $225.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $300.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-166.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $186.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-135.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -85.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 5.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
CWK
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $1.8B | 61% |
| Other | $1.1B | 39% |
