vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× Dream Finders Homes, Inc.). Dream Finders Homes, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs 0.6%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celanese Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.0% vs -22.3%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $136.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.0% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Dream Finders Homes, Inc. is a U.S. homebuilding firm that constructs and sells entry-level to luxury residential properties, including single-family homes and townhomes, across high-growth domestic markets. It also provides mortgage, title insurance and home warranty services for homebuyers.
CE vs DFH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $58.8M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 6.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -22.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $969.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $989.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $827.8M |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $58.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $54.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $130.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $54.5M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $234.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $3.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $234.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $297.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $274.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $204.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $239.4M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $968.7M |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $143.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $136.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $-126.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $143.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $-131.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $-68.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $306.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $-205.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $-110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $-247.5M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-135.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-78.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $302.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-222.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-112.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-249.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -30.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | -1.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | -2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | -4.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
DFH
| Midwest Segment | $454.2M | 37% |
| Southeast Segment | $397.5M | 33% |
| Mid Atlantic Segment | $307.3M | 25% |
| Financial Services Segment | $53.7M | 4% |
