vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Emerson Electric (EMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerson Electric is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.3B vs $2.2B, roughly 2.0× Celanese Corp). Emerson Electric runs the higher net margin — 13.9% vs 0.6%, a 13.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerson Electric posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.1% vs -7.0%). Emerson Electric produced more free cash flow last quarter ($602.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Emerson Electric's revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Emerson ElectricEMREarnings & Financial Report
Emerson Electric Co. is an American multinational corporation headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. The Fortune 500 company delivers a range of engineering services, manufactures industrial automation equipment, climate control systems, and precision measurement instruments, and provides software engineering for industrial, commercial, and consumer markets.
CE vs EMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $4.3B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $605.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 53.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 17.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 13.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $605.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $637.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $586.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $585.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $996.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $329.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $501.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 51.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 52.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 52.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $7.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $20.3B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $41.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $19.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $20.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $21.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $20.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $20.9B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $41.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $42.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $42.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $42.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $42.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $44.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $45.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $46.4B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $699.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $602.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $4.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $699.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $241.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $777.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $743.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $602.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $977.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $154.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $694.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $998.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $661.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 54.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 15.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 3.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 3.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
EMR
| Other | $1.8B | 41% |
| Software And Systems | $1.0B | 24% |
| Intelligent Devices | $996.0M | 23% |
| Safety And Productivity | $503.0M | 12% |
