vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Evergy (EVRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.7× Evergy). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 0.6%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Evergy's revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
CE vs EVRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $84.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 18.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $475.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $171.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $465.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $207.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $122.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $2.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $33.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $33.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $33.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $32.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $32.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $32.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $32.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $31.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $31.3B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $334.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $-530.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -41.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 66.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $-751.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $937.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $449.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $395.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $953.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $317.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $317.3M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $-530.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $225.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-303.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-143.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $-118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-360.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-301.3M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -25.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -23.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 66.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 48.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 2.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
