vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Expeditors International (EXPD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.3× Celanese Corp). Expeditors International runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 0.6%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Expeditors International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.3% vs -7.0%). Expeditors International produced more free cash flow last quarter ($270.3M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
CE vs EXPD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $200.7M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -14.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $200.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $222.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $183.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $203.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $235.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $169.2M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $1.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $1.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $283.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $270.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 9.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $953.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $283.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $201.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $179.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $342.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $249.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $126.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $256.9M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $270.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $190.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $163.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $329.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $239.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $118.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $246.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
