vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fidelity National Information Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.3× Celanese Corp). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 0.6%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Information Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -7.0%). Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Fidelity National Information Services's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.
CE vs FIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $511.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 97.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $724.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $599.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $9.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $13.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $805.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $18.0B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $33.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $32.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $33.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $35.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $758.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $739.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 26.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $457.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $782.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $952.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $530.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $179.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
FIS
| Banking Solutions | $1.6B | 57% |
| Other | $701.0M | 25% |
| Capital Market Solutions | $508.0M | 18% |
