vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and KEMPER Corp (KMPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× KEMPER Corp). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -0.7%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KEMPER Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.7% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $166.2M). Over the past eight quarters, KEMPER Corp's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Kemper Corporation is an American insurance provider with corporate headquarters located in Chicago, Illinois. With nearly $13 billion in assets, the Kemper family of companies provides insurance to individuals, families, and businesses.
CE vs KMPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-8.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -108.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $97.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $73.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $71.3M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $1.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $943.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $371.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $407.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $545.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $696.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $539.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $520.7M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $943.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $943.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $942.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $942.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $370.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $366.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $358.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $12.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 2.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 2.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 3.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $175.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $166.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 14.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $553.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $175.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $139.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $180.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $175.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $141.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $166.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $133.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $172.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $165.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
KMPR
| Specialty Property Casualty Insurance Segment | $995.1M | 88% |
| Life Insurance Segment1 | $140.7M | 12% |
