vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.1× Mobileye Global Inc.). On growth, Mobileye Global Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.4% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Mobileye Global Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (109.9% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Mobileye Global Inc. is a United States-domiciled, Israel-headquartered autonomous driving company. It is developing self-driving technologies and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) including cameras, computer chips, and software. Mobileye was acquired by Intel in 2017 and went public again in 2022.
CE vs MBLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 14.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 27.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $446.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $506.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $438.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $490.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $486.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $439.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-127.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-96.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-102.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $-71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $-86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 45.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 48.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 49.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 47.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | -21.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | -17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -577.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | -21.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -558.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $8.2B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $12.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $14.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $15.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $75.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $113.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $167.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $109.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $204.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $143.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $191.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $104.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
MBLY
Segment breakdown not available.
