vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Microchip Technology (MCHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.9× Microchip Technology). Microchip Technology runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 0.6%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Microchip Technology posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -7.0%). Microchip Technology produced more free cash flow last quarter ($318.9M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Microchip Technology's revenue compounded faster (-5.4% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Microchip Technology Incorporated is an American publicly traded semiconductor corporation that manufactures microcontroller, mixed-signal, analog, and Flash-IP integrated circuits.
CE vs MCHP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $62.7M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 59.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 12.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 217.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $970.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $62.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $-53.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $129.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $154.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 59.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 55.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 51.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 59.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $250.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $5.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $6.6B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $14.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.82× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $250.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $236.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $566.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $771.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $286.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $315.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $319.7M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $15.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $15.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $15.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $15.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $341.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $318.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 26.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 5.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $819.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $341.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $88.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $205.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $271.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $377.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $430.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $318.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $257.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $191.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $304.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $389.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 5.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 2.78× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
MCHP
| Mixed Signal Microcontrollers | $586.5M | 49% |
| Analog | $322.9M | 27% |
| Other Product Line | $276.6M | 23% |
