vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and MARKEL GROUP INC. (MKL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARKEL GROUP INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.6× Celanese Corp). MARKEL GROUP INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 0.6%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARKEL GROUP INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.9% vs -7.0%). MARKEL GROUP INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($599.1M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celanese Corp's revenue compounded faster (-8.1% CAGR vs -10.5%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
MARKEL GROUP INC.MKLEarnings & Financial Report
Markel Group Inc. is a group of companies headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, and originally founded in 1930 as an insurance company.
CE vs MKL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.6B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $576.8M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 22.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 5.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $48.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $576.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $751.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $657.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $549.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $48.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $59.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $49.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $12.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $39.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $66.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $18.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $75.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $4.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $18.6B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $68.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $18.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $18.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $15.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $15.7B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $68.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $67.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $66.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $64.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $61.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $62.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $59.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $57.3B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $662.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $599.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 16.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $662.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $504.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $376.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $493.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $890.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $578.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $630.7M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $599.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $453.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $335.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $420.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $838.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $521.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $558.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
MKL
| Industrial | $1.6B | 45% |
| Consumer And Other | $958.3M | 27% |
| Financial | $737.0M | 21% |
| Other | $198.8M | 6% |
| Corporate Operations | $52.0M | 1% |
| Revenue From Contract With Customer | $10.5M | 0% |
