vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and NCR Atleos Corp (NATL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.9× NCR Atleos Corp). NCR Atleos Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs 0.6%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NCR Atleos Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -7.0%). NCR Atleos Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($194.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, NCR Atleos Corp's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
NCR Voyix Corporation, previously known as NCR Corporation and National Cash Register, is a global software, consulting and technology company providing several professional services and electronic products. It manufactured self-service kiosks, point-of-sale terminals, automated teller machines, check processing systems, and barcode scanners.
CE vs NATL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 102.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $979.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $456.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $403.0M |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 6.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $456.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $412.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $357.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $352.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $419.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $395.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $374.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $343.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $403.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $330.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $275.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $219.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $250.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $283.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 6.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 8.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 8.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 13.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $231.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $194.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 16.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.78× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $239.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $231.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $148.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $194.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $124.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | -0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 5.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
NATL
| Services | $848.0M | 74% |
| APJ | $136.0M | 12% |
| Americas Excluding United States | $135.0M | 12% |
| TT | $44.0M | 4% |
