vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and INSPERITY, INC. (NSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.3× INSPERITY, INC.). On growth, INSPERITY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.4% vs -7.0%). INSPERITY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($246.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, INSPERITY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Insperity, Inc., previously known as Administaff, Inc., is a professional employer organization (PEO) headquartered in Kingwood, an area of Houston, Texas, USA. Insperity provides human resources and administrative services to small and medium-sized businesses. Since 2004, the company has been title sponsor of a professional golf tournament on the Champions Tour, previously known as the Administaff Small Business Classic.
CE vs NSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 10.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -2.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 3.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $79.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $2.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $682.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $46.0M |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $682.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $521.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $684.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $596.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $850.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $801.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $87.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $119.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $97.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $142.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $140.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $255.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $246.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 14.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $-309.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $-79.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-443.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $619.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $-150.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $246.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-86.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-449.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $606.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-164.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | -50.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
NSP
| Northeast | $455.0M | 27% |
| West | $339.0M | 20% |
| Southwest | $317.0M | 19% |
| Central | $299.0M | 18% |
| Southeast | $241.0M | 14% |
| Other Revenues | $17.0M | 1% |
