vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Royal Caribbean Group (RCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Royal Caribbean Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $2.2B, roughly 2.0× Celanese Corp). Royal Caribbean Group runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 0.6%, a 20.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Royal Caribbean Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Royal Caribbean Group's revenue compounded faster (4.1% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Royal Caribbean Group, formerly known as Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., is a cruise holding company headquartered in Miami, Florida, United States and incorporated in Liberia. It is the world's second-largest cruise line operator, after Carnival Corporation & plc. As of September 2025, Royal Caribbean Group fully owns three cruise lines: Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, and Silversea Cruises. It also holds a 50% stake in TUI Cruises, which operates Mein Schiff and Hapag-Lloyd ...
CE vs RCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $4.5B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $950.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 26.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 29.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $3.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $950.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $753.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $730.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $552.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $854.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 51.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 47.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.48 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $2.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $5.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $4.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $2.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $2.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $4.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $3.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $512.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $21.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $10.0B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $42.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 2.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $512.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $432.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $735.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $386.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $388.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $418.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $391.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $17.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $18.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $19.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $42.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $41.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $40.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $38.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $37.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $37.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $37.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $37.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 2.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 2.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 2.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 3.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $897.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-989.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $910.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $915.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $563.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-567.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -13.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 52.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
RCL
| Passenger ticket revenues | $3.0B | 68% |
| Onboard and other revenues | $1.4B | 32% |
