vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (REZI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.2× RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs 0.6%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -7.0%). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($262.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Resideo Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational company that was formed in 2018 out of a spin-off from Honeywell. It provides room air temperature, quality, and humidity control and security systems primarily in residential dwellings in the U.S. and internationally. The company operates in two segments: products and distribution. It manufactures and distributes smart-home and software products, including temperature and lighting control, security, and water and air monitoring. The com...
CE vs REZI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $136.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 491.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-825.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 26.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-5.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $661.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $661.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $753.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $577.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $692.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $413.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $603.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $299.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $262.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $-1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $299.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $200.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $262.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -85.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 7.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 3.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
REZI
| ADI Global Distribution Segment | $1.2B | 62% |
| Safety And Security | $257.0M | 14% |
| Air | $211.0M | 11% |
| Energy Service | $153.0M | 8% |
| Public Utilities Inventory Water | $91.0M | 5% |
