vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and RXO, Inc. (RXO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× RXO, Inc.). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -3.1%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celanese Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.0% vs -11.9%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $-9.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RXO, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
RXO, Inc. is a leading transportation and logistics solutions provider headquartered in the United States. Its core service portfolio includes freight brokerage, last-mile delivery for heavy and bulky goods, managed transportation services, and end-to-end supply chain optimization support, primarily catering to clients across the North American manufacturing, retail, and e-commerce segments.
CE vs RXO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-46.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -2.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -84.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $930.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $913.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $-243.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $-15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $-1.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $17.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $387.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $387.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $387.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $387.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $387.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $351.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $352.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $370.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $351.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $579.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $582.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $-8.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
RXO
| Retail Sector | $546.0M | 37% |
| Last Mile | $298.0M | 20% |
| Food And Beverage Sector | $225.0M | 15% |
| Other Sector | $185.0M | 13% |
| Managed Transportation | $133.0M | 9% |
| Automotive Sector | $93.0M | 6% |
