vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.4× Celanese Corp). Molson Coors Beverage Company runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 0.6%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Molson Coors Beverage Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.6% vs -7.0%). Molson Coors Beverage Company produced more free cash flow last quarter ($357.8M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Molson Coors Beverage Company's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
CE vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -17.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $207.8M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $2.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $896.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $6.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $22.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $458.4M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $13.1B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $27.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $26.1B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $540.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $357.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 11.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $869.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $25.4M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $691.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-189.3M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
