vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.1× Celanese Corp). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 0.6%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -7.0%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CE vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
