vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and UPBOUND GROUP, INC. (UPBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× UPBOUND GROUP, INC.). UPBOUND GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs 0.6%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UPBOUND GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $24.0M). Over the past eight quarters, UPBOUND GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Upbound Group, Inc. is a leading US provider of flexible lease-to-own solutions for consumer goods. It offers furniture, consumer electronics, home appliances, and accessories, catering to customers seeking accessible payment alternatives to traditional retail financing.
CE vs UPBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $19.7M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $120.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $695.7M |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $107.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $84.8M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $695.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $687.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $629.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $611.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $596.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $578.3M |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $41.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $24.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $238.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $137.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $613.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $33.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
UPBD
Segment breakdown not available.
