vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Workday, Inc. (WDAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Workday, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.1× Celanese Corp). Workday, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 0.6%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Workday, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.6% vs -7.0%). Workday, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($550.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Workday, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Workday, Inc. is a leading global enterprise cloud software provider that develops and distributes human capital management, financial management, and enterprise resource planning solutions. It caters primarily to mid-sized and large organizations across sectors including education, healthcare, finance, and technology, with operations spanning North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
CE vs WDAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $252.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 10.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 30.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $252.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $228.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 61.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $4.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $6.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $8.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $17.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.8B |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $8.1B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $17.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $17.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $16.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $15.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $16.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $588.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $550.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 22.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $588.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $616.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $457.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $372.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $995.6M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $550.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $588.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $421.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $516.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $947.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 46.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 49.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 6.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 4.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 3.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
WDAY
| Subscription Services | $2.2B | 92% |
| Professional Services | $188.0M | 8% |