vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and XPO, Inc. (XPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× XPO, Inc.). XPO, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.9% vs 0.6%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, XPO, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, XPO, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
XPO, Inc., formerly XPO Logistics, is an American transportation company that conducts less-than-truckload shipping in North America. The company has headquarters in Greenwich, Connecticut, and has 592 locations globally. XPO is the second largest provider of less-than-truckload (LTL) services in North America, operating in 99 percent of all U.S. postal codes.
CE vs XPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $59.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 2.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $150.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $67.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $310.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $310.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $225.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $212.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $246.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $378.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $250.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $229.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $371.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $247.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $145.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $215.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-161.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 15.2% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 2.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
XPO
| North American LTL | $1.2B | 58% |
| European Transportation | $844.0M | 42% |
