vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $649.1M, roughly 1.1× GRIFFON CORP). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 3.4%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 2.6%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
CELH vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $647.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $672.9M |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $64.1M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $202.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $39.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |